so, obviously, im not giving financial advice, and you would be very foolish to listen to me if i were, but if you went out after reading my post yesterday and put $100 "us dollars" into bitcoins when they were around $13 per, and sold them now when i post this follow up when they are $18.99 per, then you would be +$46.08 (minus fees for various exchanges)
obviously, past performance is no guarantee of future gains, but theres that.
i accept donations in bitcoin
send to 15Q4A2b8iRFXfFpvMGzJhe7tiTzFkyJknJ
Saturday, June 4, 2011
Friday, June 3, 2011
bitcoin
ok, welcome to the next thing thats completely awesome that I wish I had picked up on 6 months ago. its bitcoin, open source money.
if you want to send me any, please feel free. I accept any fraction of a full coin, with my thanks.
send to 15Q4A2b8iRFXfFpvMGzJhe7tiTzFkyJknJ
fyi, 1 bitcoin was worth <$1 usd in April, is now trading on one exchange for >$13usd per bitcoin
if you want to send me any, please feel free. I accept any fraction of a full coin, with my thanks.
send to 15Q4A2b8iRFXfFpvMGzJhe7tiTzFkyJknJ
fyi, 1 bitcoin was worth <$1 usd in April, is now trading on one exchange for >$13usd per bitcoin
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Sunday, May 29, 2011
All I'm saying is. . .
On pawn stars when the forensic handwriting expert determines the signature originated from an auto pen, the value drops to zero quite quickly. The value-add of the signature drops to zero that is. If somebody auto penned a famous name onto a bar of sunken treasure gold, you still get the value of the gold, just the fact that its signed by Shakespeare becomes irrelevant. So you're left I guess asking yourself what the value of the signed item is intrinsically. So there's that. Which civilization is credited with the concept of zero, can we reference that?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)